We live in the age of post.
Post-modernism, post-enlightenment, post-absolutist,
post-everything
We look around and all we see is me. We’re no longer we, no
longer one community, no longer humanity, but the self-absorbed, individualized
me.
There was a time when people realized how our lives are
deeply interconnected with that of others.
And not just those of a family or direct society, but
connected to humankind across space and time. A concept that seems to be
slippery sand slipping through our hands. We hardly notice as it slips away
cause we’re not focused on the sand.
We’re focused on our own two hands.
Their beauty, their importance, their usefulness and
purpose.
About how those two hands do things the right way; they
grasp reality in the true light; they know the right way to pick a fight.
But I daresay that’s a mighty arrogant way to see the world.
Yes, we live in a post-history world where we think we have
the vantage ground, the correct perspective, the benefit of objectivity.
That the way we see is truth about reality.
But may I be so bold as to disagree?
What makes us think that our blind eyes now see?
See things as they really are, void of subjectivity or the
tainted bias that comes from growing up in our society?
We are a product of our environment. Now, I wouldn’t carry
that statement as far as some, but there is a degree of truth in it.
Our brains were formed, our opinions and beliefs born, out
of our community. Whether we reacted positively or negatively to that stimulus,
those deeply ingrained values, they still shaped us.
And in our pluralist society that worships science and
objectivity, is there any way to look at the world completely objectively?
We all grew up in circles. Societies with certain
plausibility structures, whether we agreed with them or not. Maybe we rejected
what our community had to teach, so we left our circle to go to another. One
more “objective.”
But we are still in a circle, nonetheless, correct?
So no matter which circle we are in, do we really have
access to all other circles, and on top of that, are we void of the
subjectivity and influence of the circles we’ve experienced thus far?
Maybe you question me on my beliefs, on absolutivity, but
may I have the opportunity to call gently into question your objectivity?
And I digress.
Back to our forgetfulness of the web of humanity, the one
that has been being spun for our entire history. Recorded or not, we do have a
history.
But that history is also subject to the subjectivity and
values of those recording it, who capture only what they see fit to aid the
understanding of how we are going to get to their perceived goal of history and
humanity.
When it all comes down to it, I’m not sure if we are capable
of being entirely objective beings that can provide undisputedly objective
statements about reality.
So do I fight this? Do I try to hold myself up as a fraction
of a string, apart of from the entire web of silk connected across space and
time? Or do I humbly choose to recognize my interconnectedness as a small part
of humanity?
There is so much I can learn, so many things I can discern,
wisdom I can gain, perspective I can attain, from this larger perspective.
We are knit together into one quilt. One story.
The story of humanity.
No comments:
Post a Comment